We are trial lawyers representing victims of corporate and government abuse and discrimination. Our clients are victims of sexual harassment, whistleblowers, persons of color, persons who speak with accents, women, persons with disabilities, LGBTQ workers, and older workers whose rights have been violated.
“We fight those who abuse power and make them accountable in front of a jury.”
WHISTLEBLOWER RETALIATION, HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT, RETALIATION FOR OPPOSING DISCRIMINATION, AND DISCRIMINATION
Serving Seattle, Washington, and the Nation
In Jack’s +30 years of practice, the Sheridan Law Firm has continued to represent excellent clients. In August 2024, Jack became ill and had to close down the practice. Jack is currently using this website to explain the First Amendment of the Constitution, and current events, to the curious. He still has his marbles.
First Amendment Page
In The News
- The Sheridan Law Firm is Closing Down
- 2024 Whatcom County Jury Awards Former Western Washington Auditor Antonia Allen $2.99 Million For Whistleblower Retaliation
- 2024 Justice For Electrical Inspector John Boespflug: Thurston County Jury Finds Washington State Department Of Labor And Industries (“L&I”) Liable For Whistleblower Retaliation And Awards Mr. Boespflug $262,000 In Compensatory Damages.
- 2023 Black Professor Gillian Marshall Wins Appeal; She Did Not Get Tenure from the Mostly White Social Work Faculty and Management at UW Tacoma, But Now She Gets Her Day In Court
- 2022 Justice for Yakima Whistleblower Dawne Hyde: Yakima County Jury Finds DSHS Liable for Whistleblower Retaliation and Awards Ms. Hyde $1.9 million in Compensatory Damages.
- 2022 WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT IS STEPPING IT UP TO RECOGNIZE RACISM IN THE COURTROOM IN CIVIL CASES
- 2022 TROOPER JAYSON C. Earns $714,000 Judgment Against the State of Washington as Damages for Whistleblower Retaliation.
- 2021 FLYING WHILE BLACK—Despite Strong Evidence That An Elderly Black Tukwila Man Was Removed From A Jetblue Flight Owing To Race Discrimination, The 9th Circuit Court Of Appeals Rubber Stamped A District Court Dismissal Of His Civil Rights Lawsuit. The SLF Has Filed An Appeal To The U.S. Supreme Court Seeking To Reverse The Decision Of The 9th Circuit, Because It Mistakenly Applied An Anti-Terrorist Provision Of An Aviation Statute To The Civil Rights Case. That Provision Gives The Pilot Total Unfettered Discretion To Remove Any Passenger For Any Reason, Which When Applied To Acts Of Racial Discrimination, Means That When A Person Of Color Boards A Commercial Airplane In America, They Leave Their Civil Rights At The Airplane’s Door.